Source Candidates in 4 Unique Ways With Loxo Source

Loxo Natural Language Search Automates Candidate Sourcing – Save 20 Hours/$1,600 Monthly

Let me guess—resume searches eat your mornings. Loxo Natural Language Search automates sourcing, saving 20 hours and $1,600 every month. No coding.

Sound familiar? You start your day with a promising role. Then you lose hours wrangling Boolean strings, scanning resumes, and moving profiles between tabs. By lunch, you’ve viewed 60 resumes and saved maybe three. It’s slow. It’s draining. And it’s not why you got into hiring.

Here’s the short version: Loxo Natural Language Search turns what used to be manual, fiddly work into a quick question-and-answer. You type what you need in plain English. It finds people who match, fast. No coding. No guesswork.

The Problem You’re Living With Today

Let’s paint the picture. You’ve got roles to fill and not enough hours. Your team is talented, but the process is stacked against speed.

  • Endless resume scanning to find a few strong fits
  • Boolean search gymnastics that miss good candidates
  • Copy-paste chaos across job boards, your ATS, and spreadsheets
  • Sluggish time-to-fill that frustrates hiring managers

A couple of numbers to ground this:

  • SHRM reports the average cost per hire is about $4,700 — and that’s just the direct cost. Every extra week to fill adds soft costs and opportunity loss. Source: SHRM.
  • The average time to fill sits around 36 days. Longer cycles mean teams wait, projects stall, and revenue slips. Source: SHRM.
  • About 70% of the global workforce is passive talent — they’re not applying, so your search game matters. Source: LinkedIn.

What does this mean in plain English? If you’re spending hours perfecting Boolean strings and scanning resumes, you’re paying for time that rarely turns into hires.

If any of this sounds like your Tuesday morning, you’re not alone.

The Fix: How Loxo Natural Language Search Works (In Plain English)

Think of Loxo Natural Language Search like a smart assistant who understands how you describe your ideal candidate. Not keywords. Not cryptic operators. Just the way you’d talk to a colleague.

Instead of typing: (Java AND “microservices” AND Kubernetes) NOT (intern OR junior) AND (“San Francisco” OR Bay Area) AND (fintech OR payments), you ask:

“Find a senior backend engineer with Java and Kubernetes, 5+ years in fintech, Bay Area preferred.”

Here’s what actually happens behind the scenes:

  1. It understands your intent. You say “senior,” it knows to prioritize years of experience and complexity of projects.
  2. It translates your words into search logic. Think of it as an expert Boolean writer who never misses a synonym or alternate job title.
  3. It ranks candidates by fit. The best matches rise to the top, not just those with the right keywords.
  4. It learns from feedback. Shortlist or dismiss, and it refines what “good” looks like for your team.

The best part? You don’t need to be technical to use this. If you can describe what you want, you can source with it.

Quick wins you’ll likely see in week one:

  • A shortlist in minutes instead of half a day
  • 20 hours back this month by skipping manual resume scanning
  • Cleaner handoffs to hiring managers with ranked, relevant profiles

“Here’s what I’ve seen work: write your ideal candidate like you’d explain it to a friend. Loxo does the heavy lifting on the logic.”

Let’s Talk Numbers — The Kind Your CFO Will Love

If your recruiters’ fully loaded cost is roughly $80/hour, saving 20 hours a month equals about $1,600. That’s before you factor in faster time-to-fill and better candidate quality.

What does that mean in real life?

  • Two and a half workdays back for outreach and interviews instead of keyword tweaking
  • Faster shortlists so your hiring manager isn’t waiting until next week
  • Lower cost per hire by reducing manual work and external sourcing fees
Metric Before After
Hours spent sourcing/month 45–60 hrs 25–40 hrs
Direct labor cost/month $3,600–$4,800 $2,000–$3,200
Time to shortlist 2–3 days Same day
Hiring manager satisfaction Inconsistent Consistently higher

That’s like getting back two full workdays each month per recruiter — without adding headcount. Over a year, it’s the equivalent of an extra quarter of a full-time employee’s capacity.

What This Means for Your Bottom Line

  • Time You’ll Get Back: About 20 hours/month per recruiter — roughly 2.5 workdays
  • Money You’ll Save: ~$1,600/month in labor, plus reduced time-to-fill costs
  • When You’ll See Results: Within the first week for sourcing, within a month for cycle times
  • Effort Required: Low — no coding, simple prompts, quick team training

Your Monday Morning Action Plan

Ready to try Loxo Natural Language Search without derailing your week? Here’s a simple rollout that works.

  1. Pick one role that’s active and common. (10 minutes)
    Something like SDR, Staff Accountant, or Backend Engineer. You’ll learn fastest on familiar ground.
  2. Write your plain-English prompt. (10 minutes)
    Example: “Senior backend engineer, 5+ years, Java and Kubernetes, fintech experience, Bay Area preferred, available in 30–45 days.”
  3. Run the search and shortlist the top 10. (30 minutes)
    Use thumbs-up/down feedback so the system learns what “good” looks like for your team.
  4. Share a quick preview with your hiring manager. (15 minutes)
    “Here are 10 ranked candidates we can reach today. Which 3 should we prioritize?”
  5. Compare to your last manual search. (15 minutes)
    Track time saved, response quality, and first interviews scheduled.

I know what you’re thinking: “Will my team actually use it?” In my experience, once recruiters see a strong shortlist appear in minutes, the adoption takes care of itself.

Start small if you’re cautious. Pilot with one recruiter and one role for two weeks. Measure time to shortlist, candidate quality feedback, and interviews scheduled.

“Take Sarah from a B2B software company. She was skeptical too, but her first Loxo Natural Language Search shortlist landed three interviews in 48 hours.”

Yes, there’s a learning curve. Here’s how to flatten it:

  • Work from a prompt template you can reuse
  • Add context like industry and must-have tools
  • Give feedback on a handful of results so ranking improves
  • Save winning prompts for repeat roles

Why This Works Better Than Manual Boolean

Boolean search isn’t bad. It’s just brittle. You can miss great people because they typed “Golang,” not “Go,” or “People Operations,” not “HR.” Loxo Natural Language Search handles synonyms, related skills, and title variations for you.

Ever wonder why this keeps happening? Because resumes aren’t standardized. People describe the same thing five different ways. Natural language search translates your intent into a wider, smarter net.

And here’s where it gets interesting: your team stops arguing about search operators and starts collaborating on “What does success look like?” That’s a better conversation.

If you want to go deeper on AI’s impact in talent acquisition, research from firms like McKinsey and Harvard Business Review shows automation frees up high-value work — the kind your recruiters were hired to do.

Here’s what I’ve noticed: companies that move fast on candidate sourcing automation build stronger pipelines and don’t panic when a key role opens. They already have momentum.

What You’ll Actually Feel Day to Day

  • Less tab chaos. You’ll spend more time in one place, not 12 tabs.
  • Cleaner shortlists. 5–10 quality profiles vs. 50 “maybe” resumes.
  • More conversations. Sourcing becomes outreach and interviews, not fiddling with syntax.

Last month, a client told me: “I didn’t realize how much time we lost to resume scanning until we stopped doing it.” That time adds up — more than most people’s mortgage payment when you look at labor costs.

And if you’re thinking about your stack, Loxo plays well with your ATS and keeps the workflow simple. No heavy implementation. No IT ticket.

Alright, let’s wrap this up…

  • Loxo Natural Language Search replaces manual Boolean and resume scanning with plain-English sourcing.
  • Expect to save around 20 hours and $1,600 per recruiter each month — fast ROI.
  • You’ll see better shortlists, quicker, without needing technical skills.

Your Next Step: Pick one open role. Write a one-sentence prompt. Run Loxo Natural Language Search. Share the top 10 with your hiring manager today. Measure how long it took. That’s your first win.

Look, I get it. Another solution promising the moon. But this one addresses the most time-consuming part of recruiting with a tool your team will actually use. Try it on one role. If it doesn’t save you meaningful time in a week, park it. If it does — you’ll know right away.

PS — One more thing before you go: Save your best prompts in a shared doc. It turns tribal knowledge into team velocity. The next time that role opens, you’ll be ready in minutes.

Scroll to Top